Location: Season 9

Discussion: Episode 17 and 24Reported This is a featured thread

Showing 5 posts
Winnipeg
Winnipeg
Episode 17 and 24
Mar 7 2009, 11:58 AM EST | Post edited: Mar 7 2009, 11:58 AM EST
The storylines seem to match Langston and Riley held hostage #17 and Riley and Hodges held Hostage #24. I think that either the storylines are wrong or Riley likes getting the guys in trouble. How many times can you get held hostage in one season. What could Greg possibly do to endanger his job at CSI? Maybe it's a way to get Grissom and Sara to come back (unfortunately only for a visit) to help him save is butt and his career. Do you find this valuable?    
CSIDunne
CSIDunne
1. RE: Episode 17 and 24
Mar 7 2009, 3:43 PM EST | Post edited: Mar 7 2009, 3:43 PM EST
I think your right about Griss and Sara coming back,if he really does get in trouble,the only thing I think he could is beat up a unco-operative guilty suspect either inside or outside of the lab.
I think the storylines could be wrong because they do sound a little un believeable to me and one says
"the lab techs must take polygraph tests because it is suspected that there is a mole inside the lab."

2 things I find wrong with that is ANOTHER mole? and a polygraph test (lie detecter test right?) thats what Nick said himself in an episode that it is discredited all over the place and isn't used in vegas
Do you find this valuable?    
Winnipeg
Winnipeg
2. RE: Episode 17 and 24
Mar 7 2009, 4:44 PM EST | Post edited: Mar 7 2009, 4:44 PM EST
"I think your right about Griss and Sara coming back,if he really does get in trouble,the only thing I think he could is beat up a unco-operative guilty suspect either inside or outside of the lab.
I think the storylines could be wrong because they do sound a little un believeable to me and one says
"the lab techs must take polygraph tests because it is suspected that there is a mole inside the lab."

2 things I find wrong with that is ANOTHER mole? and a polygraph test (lie detecter test right?) thats what Nick said himself in an episode that it is discredited all over the place and isn't used in vegas"
I think you're right maybe someone from another site is putting out false info to throw us off or to piss us off. Why would there be another Mole at CSI they haven't established that there is problems with the way they handle evidence yet. From what I know of the US justice system Polygraphs are admissible if both parties agree to it. As in the Perp agrees to take one therefore it is evidence.

With the last episode I don't think there going to do a cliffhanger (thank goodness) but I do think they're going to kill off an old character; Sofia now a sergant in Narcotics is going to bite the dust. Louise Lombard's been cast in the NCIS spin off.
Do you find this valuable?    
CSIDunne
CSIDunne
3. RE: Episode 17 and 24
Mar 7 2009, 5:39 PM EST | Post edited: Mar 7 2009, 5:39 PM EST
I really hope we don't get another cliffhanger,but 2 awsome epi's at the end I hope they don't kill sofia though,just an un named detective never seen before would be fine,or Detective Gabrialle from happy place or Holstein from a La Cart,It wouls suck to bring Sofia back only to kill her but aslong as they overwrote that flaw with afantastic episode Do you find this valuable?    
bethy_boo
bethy_boo
4. RE: Episode 17 and 24
Mar 13 2009, 1:45 AM EDT | Post edited: Mar 13 2009, 1:45 AM EDT
I hope that Greg doesn't lose his job, and if he does that would be totally unfair!!Warrick and Sarah were supposed to be fired like 3 different times.But we'll see, if they have a 10th season. Do you find this valuable?    

Related Content

  (what's this?Related ContentThanks to keyword tags, links to related pages and threads are added to the bottom of your pages. Up to 15 links are shown, determined by matching tags and by how recently the content was updated; keeping the most current at the top. Share your feedback on Wetpaint Central.)